|
"So, " I said, "can
you put this all together for me?" "You mean sort of an
overview?" "Exactly," I
said. Martin leaned forward
in his chair, and motioned with his hands. "There are two basic pictures
of man’s state in the Bible. The first is that man is a slave to
sin. The second is that man is dead in his transgressions and sins.
In both cases, man is utterly helpless, and the helplessness is
comprehensive. It affects everything he is, and everything he
does." "So the key is the
helplessness of man. He cannot contribute to his own
salvation?" "Right. Man cannot
lift himself out of the quagmire in which he finds himself. Like someone
in quicksand, any 'advance' he makes in one area works to his disadvantage
in another." "What do you
mean?" "No part of him can
work unaffected by the Fall. An unregenerate man (by himself) can desire
salvation. He can truly want to go to Heaven when he dies. He can also
understand what going to Heaven involves. But he cannot do both at the
same time." "So you are saying
that no natural man, understanding salvation, wants it." "Correct. As Paul
states, no one seeks after God. The sinful mind is hostile to God
and cannot desire Him. But as Paul also recognized, the unregenerate Jews
did have a zeal for God, but without knowledge. This zeal only
increased their condemnation. Paul, before his conversion, delighted in
the law of God, and had a great zeal for it. But he also hated the people
of God." "I think I have
gotten confused here. You are saying that no one seeks after God, and yet
some people have a zeal for God?" "A zeal without
knowledge. Seeking after God on your own terms, with your own
understanding, is simply a subtle way of running from Him." "Check." "An unregenerate man
can love the Word of God, but only so long as he misunderstands it. An
unregenerate man can understand the Word of God, but only so long as he
hates it." " I see what you mean
by a quagmire. If he lifts his arm, the rest of him sinks
deeper." "You've got it. The
sinful mind is hostile to God. This does not mean that the non-Christian
cannot praise God or pray to Him. It does mean that everything is done in
the context of his larger rebellion against God. And the context affects
everything. Therefore, when he praises God, even his praise is sin. When
he prays, his prayer is an offense. This means that evangelical obedience,
obeying the gospel, is impossible for the non-Christian. He cannot repent
properly, and he cannot believe properly. He can perform what he believes
to be repentance (but which is actually a worldly sorrow unto death), and
he can assent to the truths of the Christian religion. But as he does
these things, he will always be doing something else that negates or
denies it. He will take back with one hand what he gives with the other.
He cannot remove himself from the context of his rebellion. He cannot
cease rebelling; he cannot surrender. If he runs up the white flag, it is
with treachery in his heart." "All right. You have
told me about the works of men, and the condemnation we have earned for
ourselves. What about the work of God?" "Do you mind a triune answer?" I smiled. "No, and
what do you mean?" "You asked about the
work of God. Let's begin with the work of the Father, and then go on to
the work of the Son and Holy Spirit." " Fine.
" "Election is the work
of the Father. Before the world was formed, before time began, the Father
chose certain individuals for salvation from their sins, and gave those
individuals as a gift to the Son. Those whom He chose not to elect, by
definition, He passed by." "Why?" "Because it was His
sovereign pleasure to do so. Because He is light, and in Him is no
darkness at all. That should be enough to satisfy us." "All right. Go
on." "In a world where
there are distinctions between individuals, those distinctions must be
God-ordained. Otherwise God is not God at all. Election is a truth that
can be seen merely by looking around us. Before I was convinced of the
truth of election as God revealed it in the Bible, I began to see it in
the world around me in God's natural revelation. Why was I born into a
Christian family, surrounded by love and the gospel? The day I was born,
thousands of others were born far away from this position of spiritual
privilege. Why was I brought up in a way that lead to my salvation? Why
was I not born into a Christless family, surrounded by nothing but
superstition and sin? Why did I not die when I was seven back in a jungle
somewhere with flies on my face? Why was I born so spiritually
privileged?" I nodded. I had often
felt the same sense of undeserved privilege. Martin
continued. "Nothing is clearer
than the fact that God placed me into the family He did, and that He only
put three children there. Why wasn't it four, with one less given to a
family lost in sin? Does not God have control over such
things?" "But couldn't it be
said in response that all these blessings, however great, were all
external? You could still have rejected Christ in spite of them, couldn't
you?" "Well, let's grant
that for the sake of discussion. We are just talking about external
blessings; we cannot see in natural revelation the full biblical doctrine
of election. But external blessings, when they concern the physical
presence of those who know and teach the gospel, are not irrelevant. We
can see that God does not treat every man alike, and that the distinctions
He makes have some bearing on who is saved, and who not. In order
to deny this, someone would have to say that there is no correlation
between how much the gospel is preached, and how many people are
saved." "I see. You are
saying that when it comes to access to saving truth, God does not treat
all men the same." "Exactly. And this is
a truth which no evangelical Christian can consistently
deny." "All right. Is there
anything else you saw in this external blessing?" "Well, it was also
clear that this decision to place me in a godly family was made before I
had done anything, good or bad. In other words, there is no way to be
proud over things such as this. What do I have that I did not receive? And
if I received it, how can I boast as though I did not? Under God's
government of the world, there are clear distinctions made between
individuals which pertain to salvation. Now if a certain measure of
election can be seen in natural revelation, we should not be surprised to
find it clearly spelled out in the Bible. And this is exactly what we
find. We have already discussed the passages which teach
this." "So the next thing
would be the work of the Son on the cross?" "Yes. The Son of God
purchased a people for Himself out of the slave market of sin. His
redemption was particular and definite." "He had something in
mind when He died?" "Right. The Son came
to earth, not to do His own will, but rather the will of the Father. Jesus
was not seeking to accomplish anything more than what the Father had
decreed." "I see. You are
saying that if Jesus died with the intention of saving anyone who was not
chosen by the Father, then He was no longer seeking to do the will of the
Father." "Yes. Let us say that
Jones has died without Christ, and that he has gone to his judgment. With
him now in Hell, is it possible to say that God secured salvation
for him through the cross?" "No. When God secures
something, it is secure." "So then, the real
question is whether God has secured anything through the cross. The
teaching of the Bible is that He secured salvation for His people. Those
who differ with this must therefore say that in the cross, God secured a
potential salvation." "What about the
universal passages. . . those where it says God loved the world, and that
sort of thing?" "God does love the
world. He sent His Son to die for the world, and take its sin
away." "So you believe that
the world is elect, and that the gospel will one day be
triumphant?" "Yes." "And that the world
will be saved, although not every last individual will be
saved." "You've got
it." "So what is the work
of the Spint7" "We are born again by
the work of the Spirit. I mentioned earlier that we were dead in our sins.
It is the Spirit who resurrects us to new life. He brings to fruition the
choice of the Father, and the purchase of the Son. The Father chooses, the
Son purchases, and the Spirit regenerates." "So this brings us to
the issue that first brought me here. Can a Christian lose his
salvation?" "Consider it this
way. A man is dead in his sin. But before the world was created, the
Father chose him for salvation. On the basis of this choice, the Son came
two thousand years ago and laid down His life to purchase this man from
the slave market of sin. On the basis of this, the Holy Spirit
regenerated him two years ago. Now, what makes us think that this
particular work of God is capable of being interrupted and frustrated? It
cannot be. If salvation is a work of man, sure, we could lose it. We lose
lots of things. But if it is the work of God, then the work shall stand,
and it will stand for eternity." "Amen," I said, and got up to go. "I guess I'll see you on Sunday."
|
||
![]() |
||
![]() | ||
![]() | ||
|
Click here to visit the Canon Press Web site.
|