![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
"What about
election?" I asked. Martin laughed. "What
about it?" "Well, the Bible
clearly teaches that there is a group of people called the elect. It seems
to me that the heart of the debate between Christians is over why they are
called that, and how they came to be elect." "That is exactly
right. That is the issue." "Mind if I try a few
thoughts out on you?" "Be my guest."
"Do we agree that God
knows everything, including the future?" Martin nodded.
"Certainly. But you do realize that some professing Christians, for the
sake of evading God's exhaustive sovereignty, have denied even that."
My eyes widened. "No,
I didn't know that." I paused for a moment. "But we surely agree that He
knows beforehand who will believe in Him, and who will not?"
"That is correct."
"Couldn't we say
then, that God made His choice of certain individuals based on His
foreknowledge of faith? That way, God chooses, and men have no one to
blame but themselves if they are not chosen." Martin thought for a
moment. "And what would the
scriptural evidence for this theory be?" "Well, 1 Peter 1:2
says that certain Christians were elect according to the
foreknowledge of God the Father. And Romans 8:28 says something
very similar. It says that those whom God foreknew, He predestined.
. . ." "Very well. Let's
return to the whole idea of foreknowledge in a moment. But before we do
that, we should carefully set out what you are saying." "Fair enough."
"At some time in
eternity, God looked down the corridors of time, into the future, and saw
that Jones would have faith in Him, and that Smith would not."
"Right."
"On that basis, God
elected Jones to salvation, and did not elect Smith." "Right again."
"Now in this
scenario, is God doing anything more than echoing the choice of Jones?"
"What do you mean?"
"It sounds like Jones
is saying that he wants to be saved, and as a consequence, God says, `Me,
too!' Is that all election is?" "I wouldn't put it
that way. God still makes the choice." "Yes, but God makes
His choice based upon the choice of the man. This is the basic difference:
one position says that God's choices are based on man's choices, while the
other position says that man's choices are based on God's."
"I see. Both sides
agree that man chooses, and both agree that God chooses. They differ over
which is the foundational choice." "Correct. And in
making man's choice foundational, the biblical terminology is stood on its
head." "What do you mean?"
"Instead of many
are called, but few are chosen, it becomes many are called but few
choose. Instead of God's elect, we become God's
electors." "I agree that you
have a point in many passages. But how would you handle the verses I used
earlier?" "Let's start with
Peter. Notice what he does not say. He says nothing about cognitive
foreknowledge of choices. He merely says that God's elect were elect
according to the foreknowledge of the Father. The text does not tell us
the content of that foreknowledge. Because both positions agree that God's
election is according to foreknowledge, this verse proves nothing either
way." "What about Romans
8?" "That passage
does tell us the object of God's foreknowledge. The object of His
foreknowledge is not history, or choices, seen apart from His sovereign
government. The object of His foreknowledge here is persons. Those
whom He foreknew, He predestined." "I agree that is what
is says. But what does foreknowledge mean then?" "The Greek word here
in Romans is proginosko. The prefix pro means before, while
the word ginosko has two meanings; one means to know, while
the other means to approve. One of the meanings of this compound
verb is to approve beforehand. Now if you put that understanding into the
Romans 8 passage, how does it read?" "For whom he approved beforehand, He also predestined to be conformed. . ." I broke off. "I see! Predestination here
is not to `becoming a Christian,' but to `becoming Christ-like' at the
resurrection." Martin smiled.
"Exactly. Those on whom God set His electing love, He predestined to a
final conformity to the image of Christ. And Paul follows this wonderful
chain of redemption right to the end in verse 30." I looked at the
passage again. Moreover whom He predestined, these He
also called; whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He
justified, these He also glorified. I looked up from the
page. "But wait a minute. Couldn't someone object that our choice of
`approve beforehand' is a case of special pleading? Why couldn't it be
translated the other way?" Martin leaned forward
in his chair. "Because the other way doesn't make any sense, for
either position." "What?"
"In our discussions,
I think you will see this again and again. Many of the verses brought to
bear against this understanding of God's sovereignty have this in common.
They invariably prove too much." "What do you mean,
prove too much?" "If foreknowledge is
simply referring to cognitive information, then this is the chain of
redemption. `For whom He foreknew (everyone), He also predestined to
Christ-likeness (everyone). Whom He predestined, He called (everyone), and
whom He called, He justified (everyone). Whom He justified, He glorified
(everyone).' There is no place for any individuals to escape. Everyone
cognitively foreknown will be glorified. And that is universalism."
"Hold on, hold on! I
didn't say that God foreknew everyone. I said that He foreknew those who
would believe in Him." "But the passage
doesn't say that. That is something which has to be imported into
the text. The object of His foreknowledge is persons, not actions, and
there is no ground in the text for making it believing persons.
That would be special pleading." I sat thinking for a
moment. Martin continued. "There is another
reason for denying that God elects based upon His foresight of our
doings." "What is that?"
"Express statements
to the contrary in Scripture." "All right, I'm game.
Show me one." "Turn to 2 Timothy
1:8-9." I turned and read.
Therefore do not be ashamed of the testimony of our
Lord, nor of me His prisoner, but share with me in the sufferings for the
gospel according to the power of God, who has saved us and called us with
a holy calling, not according to our works, but according to His own
purpose and grace which was given to us in Christ Jesus before time began.
"Allow me to ask you
a few questions." "Go ahead," I
replied. "What has God done
for us?" "He saved us and
called us." "Correct. And He did
this not according to something. . . ." "Not according to our
works." "Correct again. Now,
our works are set in contrast to that by which He did save and call
us. What was that?" "His own purpose and
grace." "Does the passage
contrast our works with our faith?" "No. It contrasts our
works with His purpose and grace." "Very good. Now where
was this given to us?" "Where?"
"Uh-huh."
"In Christ? Is that
what you mean?" "Right. When
was it given?" "Before time began."
"So God saved and
called us with a holy calling, before the beginning of time, and He did
this without reference to our works." "Well, that is true.
But how can you classify foreseen faith as a form of foreseen works? Faith
is not a work." "True faith is
not a work because true faith is a gift from God. But if faith is
something man does, on his own, and which appropriates salvation, which
another man does not receive because he did not believe, then faith is a
work." "I'm sorry, I don't
see what you are driving at. How can faith be a work?" "One of the reasons
people object to the idea of faith as a gift from God is that they think
such gifts remove the possibility of praise or blame. It turns man into a
puppet—that sort of thing. Isn't that right?" "Well, yes."
"Now how can they
insist that we keep faith as something man does—otherwise we cannot praise
or blame him for having or not having it—but then object when someone says
they have made faith a work? True praise or blame, according to this kind
of thinking, can only be assigned to a man's work." "I've got it. You are
saying that if it merits praise or blame then it is a work. If it doesn't
merit praise or blame, then the objection against faith being a gift is
gone." "That's it. So then,
God elects, according to His own good purpose (and it is good, not
arbitrary), and He does so without regard to foreseen human achievement,
virtue, works, or meritorious faith." "I've heard this
doctrine called unconditional election. Is that what the unconditional
refers to?" "Yes. It does not
mean that God had no conditions or reasons for doing what He did. It
simply means He found no conditions or reasons in man for what He
did." I sat back in my chair. "It looks to me as though you have a point." We both laughed, and I got up to go. |
||
![]() |
||
|
Texts on the Election of the Father Matthew 11:27
1 Peter 2:8-9
2 Timothy 1:8-9
Deuteronomy 10:14-15
Psalm 33:12 Luke 18:7 Matthew 24:24
Matthew 22:14
Matthew 24:31
Luke 10:21-22
Romans 8:28 Romans 8:33 1 Thessalonians 5:9
Colossians 3:12
Titus 1:1 Peter 1:1-2 Revelation 17:14
Mark 13:20 Ephesians 1:4
2 Thessalonians
2:13-14 Revelation 17:8
Romans 9:10-24
What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? Certainly not! For He says to Moses,
So then
it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but
of God who shows mercy.
Therefore He has mercy on whom He wills, and whom He wills He hardens. You will say to me then,
But indeed, O man, who are you to reply against God? Will
the thing formed say to him who formed it, `Why have you made me like
this?' Does not the potter have power over the clay, for the same lump to
make one vessel for honor and another for dishonor? What if God, wanting
to show His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much
longsuffering the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, and
that He might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy,
which He had prepared beforehand for glory, even us whom He called,
not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles? Romans 10:20
1 Corinthians 1:27-29
Ephesians 1:11-12
Ephesians 2:10
John 15:16 Philippians 2:12-13
Acts 18:27 Acts 13:48 Philippians 1:29
1 Thessalonians 1:4-5
James 2:5 Romans 11:5-8
| ||
![]() | ||
![]() |
||
![]() | ||
![]() | ||
|
Click here to visit the Canon Press Web site.
|