![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
"Do you mind if we go
over something again? I think we need to talk a little more about whether
we can lose our salvation." Martin laughed.
"Sure. But there would be a lot more peace in the church if Christians
learned to frame such questions more biblically." "How do you mean?" "When the question is
posed as to whether a Christian can lose his salvation, those for and
against line up, and debate the question as it was posed. But
salvation is not a personal possession of ours, like car keys, which can
be misplaced by us." "So what is the real
question?" "The way the question
is usually asked, we wonder if a Christian can lose his salvation, which
is the same as asking whether a Christian can lose Christ. Some say yes,
and others no." "And you would say... ?" "I would ask whether Christ can lose a Christian." "I don't get
you." "Christians are those
who are redeemed or purchased for God through the blood of Christ. We have
been bought with a price. Now if someone, so purchased, winds up in Hell,
then who has lost that person’s salvation?" "I'm sorry, I must be
thick. I still don't get what you are driving at." "Christians cannot
lose their salvation, for the simple reason that their salvation does not
belong to them. It belongs to Christ. If anyone is to lose it, it must be
He. And He has promised not to." "Where does the Bible teach that we are His possession?" "There are many
passages which cover this — too many to cover tonight. Why don't we just
look at a few? I'll give you a list of others." "Fair
enough." "In Revelation 5:9 -
10, the new song in honor of the Lamb states that He has redeemed us to
God by His blood from every tribe, tongue, people, and
nation." "And. . . ." "In I Corinthians
6:20, it says, For you were bought at a price;
therefore glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are
God's. " "It seems pretty
clear." "Right. In salvation, Christ does not become our property; we become His. So in discussing this, we must remember that all the saving is done by Him. Those who want to maintain that salvation can be lost are really saying that He is the one who loses it." "This throws the
whole debate into a completely different light. " "It does. And
frankly, it is the difference between grace and works. " "How
so?" "To assert that a man
can lose his salvation through what he does or does not do is to assert,
in the final analysis, salvation by works." "But the church in which I grew up taught that you can lose your salvation, but they also preached salvation by grace." "Not quite. They
preached a conversion experience by grace. But how is that experience to
be maintained and protected? And by whom? They begin with the Spirit, but
seek to finish through human effort." I must have looked
confused, so he continued. "Were you ever taught
that you could, by committing certain sins, place yourself outside of
Christ?" "Yes, and it terrified me." "Now, let's say that
you committed such a sin, and then were killed in a car wreck? Where would
you go?" "To
Hell." "And
why?" "Because I had
sinned, and a holy God cannot look on sin.” "And your salvation, or lack of it, was up to whom?"
"Don't you see that
your insecurity was the result of your salvation riding on a roulette
wheel every day?" "How
so?" "If you died on
Monday, you go to be with the Lord. If you died on Thursday, off to Hell.
On Sunday night, you are heavenbound again." "You are saying that this is salvation by works?"
"It seems a little
strong to say that they are professing salvation by works,
though." "Paul rebuked Peter
to his face at Antioch, and why? Because Peter did something as
trivial as withdrawing table fellowship from Gentiles temporarily.
But Paul knew that the gospel was threatened by this. How much more is it
threatened through teaching that a Christian can do a 'work' which will
blow his salvation away? This teaching makes salvation depend upon the
works of men." "You contrasted this with grace."
"But what is to
prevent someone from saying they are saved by grace, and then going to sin
up a storm?" Martin laughed.
"Nothing at all. Sinners can say and do what they please. Until the
judgment." "But how would you answer the objection?" "There are two things
worth noting about it. One is that having to answer it places me in good
company. The apostle Paul had to answer the same objection in Romans 6,
against those who objected to his message of grace. Secondly, the
answer is the one Paul gives in that passage. Recipients of grace do not
get to decide to receive forgiveness grace, while refusing death-to-sin
grace. How can we who died to sin, still live in it?" "But aren't there
some who teach that salvation can be lost simply to keep this type of
person from presumption?" "Out of a concern for 'holiness,' there have been some who insist on teaching that Christians can lose their salvation. They say that without this perspective, people will abuse grace. But if you hold the biblical perspective, you do not consider grace a possession of your own that can be abused. Rather, grace belongs to God, and He never abuses it." "Keep
going." "In Ephesians 2:8-9,
we learn that we are saved by grace through faith. In the next verse, we
learn that we are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for
good works prepared beforehand by God. God's grace is never truly
abused because it belongs to God. Outsiders abuse the word
grace, but they cannot touch the thing itself " "You sound like you
have very little respect for those on the other side of this
issue." "That is not quite
true. Some of them are teaching another gospel, and the condemnation of
the apostle is sufficient for them. But there are others who are true
Christians, and who hold this position because of their reading of certain
texts. Hebrews 10:26 is a good example." "You respect
them?" "Yes. I believe them
to be wrong, but their error proceeds from a desire to be honest with the
text. With the purveyors of a false gospel, the error comes from an almost
complete confusion of grace and works." "What about Hebrews 10:26?" "We are almost out of
time. Why don't I read that passage, adding some comments of my own based
on the context of Hebrews. Then you can go back through the book with that
context in mind. It should be helpful in chapter six as
well." "Fine." "For if
we sin willfully by going back to the sacrifices of bulls and goats
after we have received the knowledge of the truth that Christ was the
once for all sacrifice for sin, there no longer remains a sacrifice
for sins because temple sacrifice of bulls and goats is a system that
is fading away, but a certain fearful expectation of judgment, and
fiery indignation which will devour the adversaries because they are
sacrificing their bulls and goats in a temple that will be destroyed in
just a few years. " I laughed."Is all that in the Greek?" Martin grinned. "No,
but it is in the context. Read through the book of Hebrews with the
impending destruction of Jerusalem in mind, and consider the problem
caused by professing Christians who were being tempted to return to
Jerusalem in order to sacrifice there. The fire that was going to consume
the enemies of God in this passage is not hellfire." "So what is the basic
issue here?" "It is grace — grace and works. Works is a barren mother; she will never have any children, much less gracious children. Grace is fruitful; her children are many, and they all work hard." |
||
![]() |
||
|
Texts
on the Preservation of the Saints Isaiah 54:
10 Jeremiah
32:40 Matthew
18:14 John 3:16 John 3:36 John 5:24 John 6:35 John 6:3 7 John 6:40 John 6:47 John
10:27-29 Romans 5:8.
10 Romans 8:1 Romans 8:29 Romans
8:34-39 1 Corinthians
1:8.9 2 Corinthians
4:14 2 Corinthians
5:5 Ephesians
1:5 Ephesians 1:
13-14 Ephesians
4:30 1 Thessalonians
5:23,24 2 Timothy
4:18 Hebrews 9:12 Hebrews 9:15 Hebrews 10:
14 1 Peter 1:5 1 John 2:19 1 John 2:25 2 John
5:11-13 Jude 24-25 | ||
![]() | ||
![]() |
||
![]() | ||
![]() | ||
|
Click here to visit the Canon Press Web site. |
||